Chris Garner vs Dan Goldberg Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Garner vs D. Goldberg

Chris Garner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

219

Best Rank

276

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Dan Goldberg

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

219

Best Rank

276

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Garner 1 - 0 Goldberg

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chris Garner winning 2 and Dan Goldberg winning 0. The last match between Chris Garner and Dan Goldberg was at the Kiawah Island, 07-05-1990, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Chris Garner getting the victory 6-4 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Garner	1
Goldberg	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Kiawah Island(05-07-90)

Stats

Chris Garner

Dan Goldberg

C. Garner vs D. Goldberg H2H Profile

C. Garner	Stats	D. Goldberg
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
40.51% (32-47)	Career Total W/L	41.67% (10-14)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Garner vs D. Goldberg Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chris Garner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Dan Goldberg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chris Garner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dan Goldberg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chris Garner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dan Goldberg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chris Garner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Dan Goldberg winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chris Garner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 18/26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Dan Goldberg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 10/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Chris Garner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Dan Goldberg has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chris Garner winning 1 times and Dan Goldberg being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chris Garner winning 2 and Dan Goldberg winning 0.
The last match between Chris Garner and Dan Goldberg was at the Kiawah Island, 07-05-1990, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Chris Garner getting the victory 6-4 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chris Garner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Dan Goldberg has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chris Garner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dan Goldberg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chris Garner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dan Goldberg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chris Garner vs Dan Goldberg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Garner vs D. Goldberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Garner	Stats	D. Goldberg
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Garner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Coral Springs - 09-05-1994
R1 Bryan SheltonB. Shelton	L	6-2 4-6 7-6(8)	Stats
Australian Open - 17-01-1994
R1 Jacco EltinghJ. Eltingh	L	6-4 6-4 6-4	Stats
Washington - 19-07-1993
R1 Christo Van RensburgC. Van	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Newport - 05-07-1993
R1 Maurice RuahM. Ruah	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats
Queen's Club - 07-06-1993
R1 Jason StoltenbergJ. Stoltenberg	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

D. Goldberg Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Schenectady - 20-08-1990
R1 Kelly EverndenK. Evernden	L	6-4 4-6 6-2	Stats
Kiawah Island - 07-05-1990
R1 Chris GarnerC. Garner	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
New Haven CH - 07-08-1989
QF Buff FarrowB. Farrow	L	6-0 5-7 7-6	Stats
R4 John BoytimJ. Boytim	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
R3 Doug BurkeD. Burke	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Garner vs D. Goldberg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Garner	Stats	D. Goldberg
40.51% (32/47)	YTD Win/Loss	41.67% (10/14)
41.36% (79/112)	Sets Win/Loss	45.45% (25/30)
46.40% (845/976)	Games Win/Loss	47.35% (250/278)
40.91% (18/26)	Hard Win/Loss	47.62% (10/11)
39.13% (9/14)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
50.00% (5/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
222.95	Average Opponent Rank	311.17
50.00% (3/3)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
36.36% (4/7)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
35.56% (16/29)	Main Tour W/L	18.18% (2/9)
52.94% (9/8)	Challenger W/L	61.54% (8/5)
40% (28/70)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	39% (9/23)
44% (4/9)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
56% (10/18)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
55% (12/22)	Deciding Set Win %	25% (2/8)
90% (29/26)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (11/9)
10% (29/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (11/2)
12% (50/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (13/1)